You're referencing "XDTE vs QDTE: Analyzing Outsourcing Concerns" from a video titled The Shadow Interview. It seems like a unique mash-up: a comparison between two 0DTE ETFs—XDTE and QDTE—paired with the theme of "outsourcing concerns." Interesting angle! I wasn't able to find any direct mentions of "outsourcing" related to these ETFs in investor materials, analyses, or discussion threads. But I did find the video you're referring to:


What the ETFs Are (XDTE and QDTE)
XDTE is the Roundhill S&P 500 0-DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF. It sells zero-days-to-expiry (0DTE) call options on the S&P 500 each morning to generate income, while synthetically replicating long S&P 500 exposure via deep in-the-money FLEX calls
Roundhill Investments
.

QDTE is the Roundhill Innovation-100 0-DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF. Similar structure, but tied to the Nasdaq-100 or Innovation-100, aiming for income by selling 0DTE calls each morning
Roundhill Investments
MLQ
.

Key Risks and Concerns
From fund disclosures and expert analysis:

Both funds carry options risk, including the heightened sensitivity of 0DTE options to market swings, liquidity risk, active management risk, and structural risks related to FLEX options and clearing broker dependencies
PR Newswire
+2
PR Newswire
+2
.

Specifically, 0DTE options are more vulnerable due to their overnight expiration—quick moves can spike losses or deprive upside if mis-timed
PR Newswire
+1
.

Analysts note high yields may disguise NAV erosion, as much of the payout is return of capital rather than income—meaning capital value may dwindle even if distributions are high
MLQ
Seeking Alpha
.

Performance in volatile environments is mixed. QDTE has shown both strong returns and fragility depending on market conditions; it can underperform during intra-day rallies and overnight declines
MLQ
Seeking Alpha
.

XDTE showed encouraging first-year results—18.8% Return vs. 18.2% for S&P 500—with lower volatility and a better Sharpe ratio
Roundhill Investments
.

What About "Outsourcing Concerns"?
There's no obvious reference to outsourcing in any of the ETF's materials or community discussions. It could imply:

Operational outsourcing risks—perhaps concerns around how option execution, trade timing, or risk management are handled by third parties.

A metaphorical comparison, maybe referencing how these funds "outsource" risk by selling options daily.

But since I couldn't locate any direct discussion or context linking "outsourcing" to these ETFs, the term remains ambiguous in this context.

Summary Snapshot
Key Dimension   XDTE (S&P 500-based)   QDTE (Nasdaq/Innovation-100-based)
Strategy   Daily 0DTE covered call, synthetic long   Same, tied to Nasdaq-100
Early Performance   ~18.8% total return in first year   ~17.8% via QDTE, above Nasdaq-100 (~16.8%)
Volatility / Risk Profile   Lower realized volatility than benchmark   Higher sensitivity depending on market swings
Yield vs. NAV Erosion   Still present but less emphasized   High yield but notable return-of-capital risk
Outsourcing Risks   No info found   No info found